Casebased cia part 1 Mi

 

*CIA Part 1 case-based MCQs* covering Internal Audit Foundation, Charter, Ethics, IC, Governance, Risk, AIS, Fraud. Each has the IMA/IIA "trigger point" explanation.

*Topic 1: Audit Charter & Mandate*

*Case*: New CAE joins. Audit committee asks IA to perform due diligence on a merger target. Charter only mentions “assurance & consulting on risk, control, governance.” No mention of M&A. CFO says “IA must do it, you report to me.”  

*Q*: What should CAE do first?  

A. Accept engagement to maintain relationship with CFO  

B. Decline because M&A is outside IA scope  

C. Review charter with audit committee to confirm mandate and independence  

D. Accept if additional budget is provided  

*Answer:

*Trigger*: 

---

*Topic 2: Internal Audit Effectiveness - Independence*

*Case*: IA department budget is approved by CFO. CAE’s bonus is 30% based on cost savings identified by IA. CFO can reassign CAE to other projects.  

*Q*: Which condition most impairs IA independence?  

A. Budget approved by CFO  

B. Bonus tied to findings  

C. CFO can reassign CAE  

D. All equally impair  

*Answer

---

*Topic 3: Ethics - IIA Code*

*Case*: Internal auditor finds control gap in procurement. Vendor is auditor’s brother-in-law. Auditor discloses to CAE and recuses from audit. CAE assigns auditor to review vendor’s invoices anyway because “you know the process best.”  

*Q*: Which IIA Code principle is violated?  

A. Integrity  

B. Objectivity  

C. Confidentiality  

D. Competency  

*Answer:

*Topic 4: Internal Control - COSO Components*

*Case*: Company has code of conduct, whistleblower hotline, auth limits, and quarterly board review of IA reports. Cashier can approve & record & reconcile bank.  

*Q*: Which COSO component is deficient?  

A. Control Environment  q

B. Control Activities  

C. Information & Communication  

D. Monitoring  

*Answer:

---

*Topic 5: IC Limitations - Collusion*

*Case*: Warehouse requires 2 signatures to release goods >$10K. Investigation finds storekeeper + security guard colluded: one signs, other removes goods. Loss $200K.  

*Q*: What IC limitation is shown?  

A. Human error  

B. Management override  

C. Collusion  

D. Cost/benefit  

*Answer

*Topic 6: Governance - 3 Lines Model*

*Case*: 1st line: Ops mgmt owns risks. 2nd line: Compliance writes policy. 3rd line: IA audits. CFO asks IA to design new AP control then audit it next quarter.  

*Q*: What governance principle is violated?  

A. First line accountability  

B. Second line independence  

C. Third line independence  

D. No violation if documented  

*Answer

*Topic 7: Risk Universe vs Risk Assessment*

*Case*: CAE presents audit plan. Board asks “How do you know you covered all key risks?” CAE shows risk universe with 200 risks from ERM, regulatory, strategic, ops. Plan covers 25 audits.  

*Q*: What links universe to plan?  

A. Risk Matrix  

B. Risk Assessment  

C. Heat Map  

D. Audit Charter  

*Answer: 

*Topic 8: Heat Map - Interpretation*

*Case*: Heat map shows Cyber Risk: Likelihood = 4/5, Impact = 5/5 = Red. Supply Chain Risk: L=2/5, I=5/5 = Yellow. Mgmt spends 80% of budget on supply chain.  

*Q*: What does heat map indicate about resource allocation?  

A. Aligned with risk  

B. Misaligned, cyber needs more resources  

C. Misaligned, supply chain over-funded  

D. B & C are correct  

*Answer

*Topic 9: AIS - Application Controls*

*Case*: Payroll system: 1. Input rejects hours >24/day. 2. System calculates OT automatically. 3. Exception report for net pay variance >10% vs last month.  

*Q*: Which is a processing control?  

A. 1 only  

B. 2 only  

C. 3 only  

D. 1 & 3 only  

*Answer:

*Topic 10: Fraud Risk - Fraud Triangle*

*Case*: AR clerk has gambling debt (pressure), can issue credit memos without approval (opportunity), believes “company owes me” (rationalization). $80K credit memos issued to fake customers.  

*Q*: Which element of fraud triangle is “can issue without approval”?  

A. Pressure  

B. Opportunity  

C. Rationalization  

D. Detection  

*Answer:

---

*Topic 11: Risk Logs vs Risk Register*

*Case*: During audit, PM says “We tracked that vendor delay risk in the project risk log and closed it.” IA finds no entry in ERM risk register. Risk reoccurred.  

*Q*: What control gap exists?  

A. No risk assessment  

B. No integration between project log & ERM register  

C. No heat map  

D. No risk appetite  

*Answer:

---

*Topic 12: Assurance vs Consulting - Nature of Work*

*Case*: Audit committee asks IA to: 1. Test if new vendor payments comply with policy. 2. Facilitate workshop to design better vendor onboarding.  

*Q*: Classify 1 & 2.  

A. Both assurance  

B. Both consulting  

C. 1=Assurance, 2=Consulting  

D. 1=Consulting, 2=Assurance  

*Answer:

---

*CIA Part 1 Trigger Points Summary*

Topic If you see... Think...

**Charter** “CFO told IA to…” Check audit committee mandate

**Independence** Bonus tied to findings Self-interest threat

**Objectivity** Related party + still on audit Disclosure ≠ cure

**SOD** 1 person does 2+ of Auth/Custody/Record Control Activities fail

**3 Lines** IA designs control it will audit 3rd line violation

**Heat Map** Red risk gets less budget than yellow Misalignment

**Fraud Triangle** “Can override, no approval” Opportunity = IA’s focus

**Assurance vs Consulting** “Test compliance” vs “help design” Assessment vs Advice

www.gmsisuccess.in

*CIA Part 1 Tricky MCQs - Batch 1 of 5*

*Q1: Audit Charter - Approval Authority*  

*Case*: CAE drafts new audit charter expanding scope to include ESG audits. CEO approves and signs it. Audit committee not consulted.  

*Q*: Is the charter valid per IIA Standards?  

A. Yes, CEO is highest executive  

B. No, board/audit committee must approve charter  

C. Yes, if CAE agrees  

D. No, IIA must approve  

*Answer: 

*Q2: Mission of Internal Audit*  

*Case*: CAE tells staff: “Our mission is to find fraud and report to audit committee.” Charter says: “Enhance and protect organizational value by providing risk-based assurance, advice, insight.”  

*Q*: What is wrong with CAE’s statement?  

A. Nothing, fraud is key  

B. Mission excludes consulting  

C. Mission excludes objectivity  

D. Mission is too narrow vs IIA definition  

*Answer: 

*Q3: Independence - Functional vs Administrative Reporting*  

*Case*: CAE reports functionally to CFO for pay/promotion and administratively to audit committee for audit plan.  

*Q*: What Standard is violated?  

A. 1100 – Independence  

B. 1110 – Organizational Independence  

C. 1120 – Objectivity  

D. 1130 – Impairments  

*Answer:

*Q4: Objectivity Impairment - Cooling Off*  

*Case*: New auditor transferred from AP dept last month. CAE assigns auditor to audit AP controls because “you know the area.”  

*Q*: What does IIA require?  

A. Ok if disclosed  

B. Prohibited for 1 year per 1130.A1  

C. Ok if supervised  

D. Prohibited forever  

*Answer:

*Q5: Ethics - Confidentiality*  

*Case*: During lunch, IA shares with friend in Sales: “We’re auditing your bonus calc next month, better clean up those spreadsheets.”  

*Q*: Which Code principle violated?  

A. Integrity  

B. Objectivity  

C. Confidentiality  

D. Competency  

*Answer:

*Q6: COSO - 5 Components vs 17 Principles*  

*Case*: Co has: 1. Tone at top, 2. Risk assessment process, 3. Auth limits, 4. IT reports, 5. IA audits. Auditor says “We cover all 5 COSO components.”  

*Q*: Is this sufficient for COSO compliance?  

A. Yes, 5 components covered  

B. No, must cover 17 principles  

C. Yes, if documented  

D. No, need external audit  

*Answer:

*Q7: IC Limitation - Management Override*  

*Case*: Policy: All wires >$50K need dual approval. CEO emails treasury: “Send $200K now, I’ll sign later. Board deal.” Treasury complies.  

*Q*: What IC limitation occurred? What should IA report?  

A. Collusion; recommend terminate treasury  

B. Management override; control design ok, operation failed  

C. Human error; need training  

D. No limitation, CEO has authority  

*Answer: 

*Q8: Governance - Accountability*  

*Case*: Board delegated risk oversight to audit committee. Audit committee delegated to CRO. CRO delegated to risk manager. Loss occurs. Who is accountable?  

*Q*: Per governance principles?  

A. Risk manager  

B. CRO  

C. Audit committee  

D. Board  

*Answer: 

*Q9: Risk Universe - Completeness*  

*Case*: ERM risk universe built from finance + operations interviews only. Cyber breach occurs. Risk was not in universe. CAE says “Not IA’s fault, ERM owns universe.”  

*Q*: What is IA’s responsibility per Standard 2120?  

A. None, ERM owns universe  

B. Evaluate adequacy of risk mgmt process, including completeness  

C. Create risk universe  

D. Only audit risks in plan  

*Answer: 

*Q10: Heat Map - Residual vs Inherent Risk*  

*Case*: Heat map shows “Cyber” as Yellow = Medium. Footnote: “After controls.” Inherent was Red. Mgmt says “We’re medium risk now.” Audit finds key control not operating.  

*Q*: What should heat map show?  

A. Keep as Yellow, controls designed  

B. Move to Red until controls tested effective  

C. Remove from map  

D. Show both inherent and residual  

*Answer: 

*Batch 2: Q11-20*

*Q11: Risk Log - Aging*  

*Case*: Project risk log: “Vendor bankruptcy” identified Day 1, probability Low. Day 90, vendor files Ch.11. Log still shows Low, no mitigation.  

*Q*: What risk process failed?  

A. Risk identification  

B. Risk assessment update  

C. Risk response  

D. Risk monitoring  

*Answer: 

*Q12: Control Application - Preventive vs Detective*  

*Case*: System auto-blocks invoice if PO > invoice tolerance 5%. Monthly report lists all overrides.  

*Q*: Classify each control.  

A. Both preventive  

B. Block = preventive, Report = detective  

C. Both detective  

D. Block = detective, Report = preventive  

*Answer

*Q13: AIS - IT General Controls vs Application Controls*  

*Case*: Finding: “Programmers have access to production to fix bugs faster.”  

*Q*: What type of control deficiency?  

A. Application control  

B. IT General Control - Program Change  

C. Input control  

D. No deficiency if logged  

*Answer:

*Q14: Fraud Risk - Pressures*  

*Case*: Sales team: 90% of comp is commission, quarter-end target missed 3x, VP says “No bonus unless we hit target, jobs at risk.”  

*Q*: What fraud risk factor is highest?  

A. Opportunity  

B. Rationalization  

C. Pressure/Incentive  

D. Capability  

*Answer:

*Q15: Fraud Risk Assessment - Standard 2120.A2*  

*Case*: Annual audit plan has no fraud-specific procedures. CAE says “External audit covers fraud, we focus on ops.”  

*Q*: Does this comply with IIA Standards?  

A. Yes, external audit has responsibility  

B. No, IA must evaluate fraud risk mgmt per 2120.A2  

C. Yes, if audit committee agrees  

D. No, IA must investigate fraud  

*Answer

*Q16: Data Analytics - Completeness Test*  

*Case*: IA gets AP data from ERP. Uses SUM of invoices to tie to G/L. Ties exactly. Concludes data complete.  

*Q*: What risk remains?  

A. None, tied to G/L  

B. Invoices outside ERP not captured  

C. Accuracy not tested  

D. Both B & C  

*Answer:

*Q17: Assurance vs Consulting - Impairment*  

*Case*: IA facilitates control design workshop for new process. Next year, IA audits same process.  

*Q*: Is independence impaired?  

A. Yes, always  

B. No, if safeguards met per 1130.C1  

C. Yes, must wait 2 years  

D. No, consulting never impairs  

*Answer: 

*Q18: Internal Control - Manual vs Automated*  

*Case*: Control: “Clerk reviews all invoices >$5K for approval.” IA finds clerk reviews 2,000/month, 5 errors/month. IT offers auto 3-way match.  

*Q*: Why is automated better?  

A. Cheaper only  

B. More consistent, less human error  

C. Easier to override  

D. Not better, manual has judgment  

*Answer: 

*Q19: Risk Appetite vs Tolerance*  

*Case*: Board: “We will not accept any cyber breach.” CISO: “We budget for 2 incidents/year <$100K each.”  

*Q*: Which statement is risk appetite vs tolerance?  

A. Board = tolerance, CISO = appetite  

B. Board = appetite, CISO = tolerance  

C. Both appetite  

D. Both tolerance  

*Answer:

*Q20: Ethics - Competency*  

*Case*: CAE assigns IT auditor to review complex derivative valuation. Auditor has no derivatives training but “will learn on job.”  

*Q*: What Code principle at risk?  

A. Integrity  

B. Objectivity  

C. Confidentiality  

D. Competency  

*Answer: 

---

Here are *Q21-Q50: Next 30 tricky CIA Part 1 MCQs* with case, answer, trigger point.

---

*CIA Part 1 Tricky MCQs - Batch 3: Q21-30*

*Q21: Audit Evidence - Sufficiency vs Appropriateness*  

*Case*: Auditor tests 500 invoices, all from January, all under $100. Concludes “AP controls effective all year.”  

*Q*: What audit evidence problem exists?  

A. Not sufficient  

B. Not appropriate - not relevant/reliable  

C. Both A & B  

D. No problem, large sample  

*Answer:

*Q22: Sampling - Statistical vs Judgmental*  

*Case*: Population 10,000 items. Auditor haphazardly picks 50 “that look risky.” Finds 0 errors. Concludes “error rate <1%.”  

*Q*: Can auditor project to population?  

A. Yes, 0/50 = 0%  

B. No, judgmental sample can’t be projected statistically  

C. Yes, if approved by CAE  

D. No, sample too small  

*Answer: 

*Q23: CAATs - Parallel Simulation*  

*Case*: IA re-performs AP 3-way match in IDEA using raw data. Results differ from production system.  

*Q*: What CAAT is this? What does difference indicate?  

A. Test data; program error  

B. Parallel simulation; production logic error or data issue  

C. Embedded audit module; fraud  

D. Integrated test facility; no issue  

*Answer:

*Q24: ERM - COSO ERM vs ISO 31000*  

*Case*: Risk mgr says “We follow ISO 31000 so we don’t need risk appetite statement.”  

*Q*: Is this correct?  

A. Yes, ISO 31000 prohibits appetite  

B. No, both frameworks require risk appetite/criteria  

C. Yes, only COSO ERM needs appetite  

D. No, ISO 31000 is not ERM framework  

*Answer:

*Q25: COSO Principle 10 - Selects & Develops Control Activities*  

*Case*: Company has manual approvals for all transactions. No automated controls. Many errors.  

*Q*: Which COSO principle is deficient?  

A. Principle 6 – Specifies objectives  

B. Principle 10 – Selects control activities including automation  

C. Principle 12 – Deploys through policies  

D. Principle 16 – Performs evaluations  

*Answer:

*Q26: ITGC - Logical Access - Least Privilege*  

*Case*: All accountants have SAP_ALL to “cover vacations.” IT says “We trust them.”  

*Q*: What ITGC principle violated? What’s the risk?  

A. Change mgmt; unauthorized changes  

B. Least privilege; broad fraud/error risk  

C. Backup; data loss  

D. Physical security; theft  

*Answer: 

*Q27: ITGC - Program Change Management*  

*Case*: Developer fixes bug directly in production on Friday night. Documents change Monday. No testing, no approval.  

*Q*: What controls failed?  

A. Physical security  

B. Change management - approval, testing, separation  

C. Backup  

D. Logical access  

*Answer:

*Q28: Backup & Recovery - RTO vs RPO*  

*Case*: System crashes. Last backup 24h ago. Takes 6 hours to restore. Mgmt says “We can lose 1 day data, but must be up in 2 hours.”  

*Q*: Which metric failed? What is RTO vs RPO?  

A. RTO failed; RTO=2h, RPO=24h  

B. RPO failed; RTO=6h, RPO=1d  

C. Both failed; RTO=2h, RPO=0  

D. No failure, within tolerance  

*Answer: 

*Q29: Fraud Scheme - Lapping*  

*Case*: AR clerk steals customer A check, covers with customer B check next day, covers B with C, etc. Month-end aging looks normal.  

*Q*: What detective control best finds lapping?  

A. Bank reconciliation  

B. Review AR aging by customer, compare to deposits  

C. Confirm receivables  

D. Both B & C  

*Answer: 

*Q30: Whistleblower - Anti-Retaliation*  

*Case*: Employee reports VP fraud via hotline. Next week employee gets poor review + demoted. HR says “Unrelated performance.”  

*Q*: What governance risk exists? What should IA do?  

A. No risk if HR documented  

B. Retaliation risk, chills future reporting; IA should test hotline process  

C. Only legal issue, not IA  

D. Retaliation ok if fraud unproven  

*Answer: 

---

*Batch 4: Q31-40*

*Q31: Audit Reporting - Condition, Criteria, Cause, Effect, Recommendation*  

*Case*: Finding: “3 invoices paid twice, $15K. Should not happen. Fix it.”  

*Q*: What elements missing per Standard 2410?  

A. Criteria, Cause  

B. Cause, Effect, Recommendation  

C. Criteria, Cause, Effect  

D. All 5Cs present  

*Answer: 

*Q32: Follow-up - Standard 2500*  

*Case*: IA issued 10 findings. Mgmt agreed to all, due dates passed. IA has not followed up 6 months later. New audit starts.  

*Q*: What Standard violated?  

A. 2400 – Communicating Results  

B. 2500 – Monitoring Progress  

C. 2600 – Communicating Risk Acceptance  

D. None, mgmt owns remediation  

*Answer: 

*Q33: QAIP - Internal vs External Assessment*  

*Case*: QAIP includes annual self-assessment by CAE. No external assessment in 7 years. CAE says “Self-assessment is enough.”  

*Q*: Does this comply with Standard 1312?  

A. Yes, self-assessment meets QAIP  

B. No, external assessment required every 5 years  

C. Yes, if audit committee approves  

D. No, external needed every 3 years  

*Answer: 

*Q34: Risk Assessment - Inherent vs Control vs Detection Risk*  

*Case*: Audit plan prioritizes areas with weak controls. Board asks “Why not audit high inherent risk areas with strong controls?”  

*Q*: Best response?  

A. Strong controls mean low audit risk, skip  

B. High inherent risk + strong controls = still test due to detection risk + control could fail  

C. Agree, remove from plan  

D. Audit only fraud risks  

*Answer

*Q35: Consulting Engagement - Objectivity Safeguards*  

*Case*: IA facilitates risk workshop, recommends specific control. Mgmt implements. 2 years later IA audits it.  

*Q*: Is objectivity impaired?  

A. Yes, always if IA recommended  

B. No, if >12 months passed + disclosed + no mgmt decision made by IA  

C. Yes, need 3 years  

D. No, consulting never impairs  

*Answer: 

*Q36: COSO Principle 13 - Uses Relevant Information*  

*Case*: Mgmt decisions based on Excel with manual data entry, no validation, 10 tabs linked. Errors frequent.  

*Q*: Which principle deficient?  

A. P11 – Selects general IT controls  

B. P13 – Uses relevant, quality information  

C. P14 – Communicates internally  

D. P17 – Evaluates & communicates deficiencies  

*Answer: 

*Q37: Fraud Triangle - Rationalization*  

*Case*: Employee steals inventory. Says “Company is insured, no one gets hurt. They underpay me anyway.”  

*Q*: Which element? Why can IA least control this?  

A. Pressure; IA can’t control personal debt  

B. Opportunity; IA can’t control org structure  

C. Rationalization; IA can’t control personal ethics  

D. Capability; IA can’t control skills  

*Answer: 

*Q38: AIS - Input Controls - Field Check*  

*Case*: Date field accepts “2026-02-30”.  

*Q*: What input control failed?  

A. Existence check  

B. Reasonableness check  

C. Validity check  

D. Format check  

*Answer: 

*Q39: Governance - Board Committees*  

*Case*: Company has no audit committee. Board has 5 members: CEO, CFO, COO, Sales VP, HR VP. CAE reports to CFO.  

*Q*: What governance deficiency exists?  

A. No deficiency if board active  

B. No independent directors, no audit committee = independence impaired  

C. CAE should report to CEO  

D. Need more board members  

*Answer: 

*Q40: Risk Matrix - Qualitative vs Quantitative*  

*Case*: Risk matrix: Impact = “High, Med, Low”. One manager says “My project loss is $10M, that’s High.” Another: “My $10M loss is Medium, we’re bigger.”  

*Q*: What’s the problem with matrix?  

A. No problem, judgment ok  

B. Lack of quantitative criteria/definition  

C. Should use colors only  

D. Should use numbers 1-5 only  

*Answer:

---

*Batch 5: Q41-50*

*Q41: Control Self-Assessment CSA*  

*Case*: IA facilitates workshop where mgmt identifies risks & controls. Mgmt signs off “controls effective.” IA issues audit report “controls effective” without testing.  

*Q*: Is this acceptable per Standards?  

A. Yes, CSA is sufficient evidence  

B. No, CSA ≠ audit evidence, must test  

C. Yes, if mgmt competent  

D. No, CSA prohibited  

*Answer:

*Q42: Embedded Audit Module*  

*Case*: IT installs code in ERP to flag >$100K invoices to log file for IA. Runs continuously.  

*Q*: What CAAT is this? Benefit?  

A. Parallel simulation; point-in-time  

B. Embedded audit module/EAM; continuous monitoring  

C. Test data; design test  

D. ITF; periodic  

*Answer:

*Q43: Fraud - Kiting*  

*Case*: Company transfers $100K from Bank A to Bank B on Dec 31, records deposit in B but not withdrawal in A until Jan 2. Cash overstated $100K at year-end.  

*Q*: What fraud scheme? Best detection?  

A. Lapping; AR aging  

B. Kiting; bank transfer schedule + cutoff bank statements  

C. Channel stuffing; sales cut-off  

D. Bill & hold; inventory count  

*Answer: 

*Q44: COSO Principle 8 - Considers Fraud Risk*  

*Case*: Risk assessment covers ops, compliance, reporting risks. No fraud risks listed. Mgmt says “External audit covers fraud.”  

*Q*: What COSO principle gap?  

A. P6 – Specifies objectives  

B. P7 – Identifies risks  

C. P8 – Considers potential for fraud  

D. P9 – Identifies changes  

*Answer: 

*Q45: Ethics - Competency - Due Professional Care*  

*Case*: Auditor tests 5 items, standard says 25. Concludes “no issues.” Working papers show no sampling rationale.  

*Q*: What violated?  

A. Integrity  

B. Objectivity  

C. Confidentiality  

D. Competency & Due Professional Care 1220  

*Answer: 

*Q46: Risk Appetite - Zero Tolerance*  

*Case*: Policy: “Zero tolerance for safety incidents.” Plant has 2 minor injuries, no lost time. VP not reported to board per policy.  

*Q*: What issue with “zero tolerance” statement?  

A. None, good tone  

B. Unrealistic, causes non-reporting  

C. Should say “low tolerance”  

D. B & C  

*Answer: 

*Q47: AIS - Output Controls*  

*Case*: Payroll report distributed to all managers shows employee SSNs and pay rates.  

*Q*: What control failed?  

A. Input control  

B. Processing control  

C. Output control - distribution/security  

D. ITGC - change mgmt  

*Answer: 

*Q48: Governance - Whistleblower Hotline Ownership*  

*Case*: Hotline administered by HR. HR investigates all complaints including HR fraud. Reports to CEO.  

*Q*: What governance best practice violated?  

A. None, HR owns people issues  

B. Hotline should be independent, not investigated by subject of complaint  

C. Should report to audit committee, not CEO  

D. Both B & C  

*Answer:

*Q49: Internal Control - Compensating Control*  

*Case*: SOD not possible in small branch: 1 person does all cash. Mgmt installs camera + daily remote review of tape + surprise counts.  

*Q*: What type of control is this?  

A. Preventive  

B. Detective  

C. Compensating  

D. Corrective  

*Answer:

*Q50: Audit Charter - Access to Records*  

*Case*: Auditee refuses IA access to legal files: “Attorney-client privilege, charter doesn’t override law.”  

*Q*: Is auditee correct? What should CAE do?  

A. Auditee correct, drop request  

B. Charter grants access, but privilege may limit; escalate to audit committee + legal  

C. CAE can force access  

D. Subpoena records  

*Answer: 

www.gmsisuccess.in

Casebased practice questions with answers

*US CMA Case-Based Practice Set - Batch 1 of 5*

*Topic 1: Investment in Associates*

*Case*: MedCorp owns 30% of BioTech and has significant influence but not control. BioTech reports net income of $2M and pays $500K dividends. MedCorp purchased the stake for $6M.

*Q*: What is MedCorp’s investment balance at year-end using equity method?

*A*: $6M + (30% × $2M) - (30% × $500K) = $6M + $600K - $150K = *$6.45M*

*Logic*: Equity method: + share of NI, - share of dividends.

*Topic 2: Investment in Subsidiary vs Trading*

*Case*: Parco owns 80% of Subco. It also bought 2% of TechCo as short-term trading. Subco’s NI = $1M. TechCo FMV increased $20K.

*Q*: How does Parco report Subco vs TechCo income?

*A*: Subco: Consolidate 100% NI, show NCI for 20%. TechCo: $20K unrealized gain to Income Statement, as Trading securities are FV through NI.

*Logic*: Control = consolidate. Trading = FVPL.

*Topic 3: HTM vs Available for Sale*

*Case*: BankCo buys 5-yr bonds for $95K, intends to hold to maturity. Market value at YE = $98K. If classified AFS instead, how does $3K affect statements?

*A*: *HTM*: No gain recognized, stays at amortized cost $95K+. *AFS*: $3K unrealized gain to OCI, not I/S.

*Logic*: HTM = amortized cost. AFS = FVOCI.

*Topic 4: Operating vs Finance Lease - US GAAP*

*Case*: LeaseCo signs 4-yr lease for equipment. FV = $100K, PV of payments = $95K, useful life 5 yrs. No ownership transfer.

*Q*: Finance or operating lease? Why?

*A*: *Finance lease*. PV ≥ 90% of FV = $95K/$100K = 95%. Meets finance criteria under ASC 842.

*Logic*: 5 tests: transfer, option, term ≥75% life, PV ≥90% FV, specialized asset.

*Topic 5: Revenue Recognition - US GAAP 5-Step*

*Case*: SoftwareCo sells license + 1yr support for $120K, no separate prices. SSP: License $100K, Support $40K.

*Q*: How much revenue at delivery of license?

*A*: Allocate: License = 100/140 × 120K = $85,714 recognized at delivery. Support $34,286 deferred.

*Logic*: Step 4: Allocate to PO based on SSP.

*Topic 6: Cash Flow Statement - US GAAP*

*Case*: Net Income $200K, Depr $50K, A/R ↑$30K, Inventory ↓$10K, A/P ↓$15K, Equip purchase $100K, Dividend paid $40K.

*Q*: CFO, CFI, CFF?

*A*: *CFO* = 200+50-30+10-15 = $215K. *CFI* = -$100K. *CFF* = -$40K.

*Logic*: Indirect method: NI ± non-cash ± WC changes.

*Topic 7: Internal Control - Limitations*

*Case*: CEO overrides segregation of duties to approve $2M payment. Fraud occurs.

*Q*: Which IC limitation does this show?

*A*: *Management override*. Internal control cannot prevent collusion or override by top mgmt.

*Logic*: IC provides reasonable, not absolute, assurance.

*Topic 8: Gross Profit Ratio & EPS*

*Case*: Sales $1M, COGS $600K, NI $150K, 100K shares, 20K convertible bonds at $50, 8% rate, tax 25%.

*Q*: GPR and Diluted EPS?

*A*: *GPR* = (1M-600K)/1M = *40%*. *Diluted EPS*: NI + bond interest net of tax = 150K + (20K×50×8%×0.75) = 150K+60K = 210K. Shares = 100K + 20K = 120K. DEPS = *$1.75*.

*Logic*: If-converted method for convertible debt.

*Topic 9: Property Dividend & Stock Split*

*Case*: Co declares 10% property dividend, FMV $200K, book $150K. Later does 2-for-1 stock split when 1M shares @ $50 out.

*Q*: Impact on RE and shares out?

*A*: *Property dividend*: DR RE $200K, CR Gain $50K, distribute asset. *Stock split*: Shares = 2M, Par halved, no RE impact.

*Logic*: Prop div at FMV. Stock split no journal.

*Topic 10: Contingency & Purchase Commitment*

*Case*: Lawsuit probable, estimate $300K-$500K. Also signed PO for $1M inventory, FMV now $800K.

*Q*: What to accrue?

*A*: *Lawsuit*: Accrue $300K, low end of range + disclose. *Purchase commitment*: Recognize $200K loss if non-cancelable.

*Logic*: ASC 450: Probable + estimable. Loss on firm commitments.

*Topic 11: Job Order vs Process Costing*

*Case*: CustomHome builds 5 unique houses. PaintCo makes 1M gallons.

*Q*: Which costing system for each?

*A*: CustomHome = *Job order*, unique jobs. PaintCo = *Process*, homogeneous units.

*Logic*: Heterogeneous vs continuous flow.

*Topic 12: Absorption vs Variable Costing*

*Case*: Produced 10K, sold 8K. DM $5, DL $3, VOH $2, FOH $50K total. Sell $20.

*Q*: NI under absorption vs variable?

*A*: *Variable*: (20-10)×8K - 50K = $30K. *Absorption*: (20-15)×8K = $40K. Diff = $10K = FOH in inventory 2K×$5.

*Logic*: FOH expensed vs inventoried.

*Topic 13: Labor Efficiency & VOH Efficiency Variance*

*Case*: Std: 2 hrs @ $20. Actual: 1,800 hrs for 1,000 units, rate $21. VOH rate $5/hr.

*Q*: LEV and VOHEV?

*A*: *LEV* = (1,800 - 2,000)×20 = *$4,000 F*. *VOHEV* = (1,800 - 2,000)×5 = *$1,000 F*.

*Logic*: (AH-SH)×SR for both.

*Topic 14: ROI vs RI*

*Case*: Division NI $500K, Assets $2M, Corp WACC 10%.

*Q*: ROI and RI?

*A*: *ROI* = 500K/2M = *25%*. *RI* = 500K - (2M×10%) = *$300K*.

*Logic*: RI encourages projects > WACC even if they lower ROI.

*Topic 15: Responsibility Centers*

*Case*: Plant manager controls costs but not sales price or investment.

*Q*: What type of center?

*A*: *Cost center*. Measures efficiency on controllable costs only.

*Logic*: Revenue center = sales, Profit = rev-cost, Investment = rev-cost-assets.

 *Batch 2 of 5: 20 more CMA case-based questions* 👇

*US CMA Case-Based Practice Set - Batch 2*

*Topic 16: Data Mining & Data Analytics*

*Case*: RetailCo has 5M transactions. Internal audit wants to find duplicate vendor payments. Data analyst runs Benford’s Law test + duplicate invoice search on ERP data.

*Q*: What is this activity called in IMA terms?

*A*: *Data analytics* - specifically descriptive + diagnostic analytics using *data mining* to detect anomalies.

*Logic*: CMA Part 1 Tech & Analytics domain: using data to improve controls.

*Topic 17: Integrated Reporting - 6 Capitals*

*Case*: SustainCo’s annual report shows impact on natural, human, social, manufactured, intellectual, and financial capital.

*Q*: What reporting framework is this?

*A*: *Integrated Reporting <IR> Framework* by IIRC.

*Logic*: Focuses on value creation across 6 capitals, not just financial.

*Topic 18: Proprietary Theory vs Entity Theory*

*Case*: SubCo 80% owned by ParCo earns $1M. Under proprietary theory, what NI does ParCo report from SubCo?

*A*: *$800K only* - 80% share. NCI is ignored.

*Logic*: Proprietary = view from owners’ perspective. Entity = consolidate 100% + show NCI.

*Topic 19: Wasting Assets*

*Case*: OilCo buys oil field for $10M, est. 1M barrels. Year 1 extracted 200K barrels.

*Q*: Depletion expense and classification?

*A*: *$2M depletion* = 200K/1M × $10M. Classified as *wasting asset*, contra-asset to natural resource.

*Logic*: Depletion = units-of-production for natural resources.

*Topic 20: Prepayment vs Accrual - US GAAP*

*Case*: Dec 31: Paid $12K rent for Jan-Mar next year. Also owe $5K wages for Dec, paid Jan 5.

*Q*: Journal impact on Dec 31 statements?

*A*: *Prepaid rent*: Dr Prepaid $12K, asset. *Wages*: Dr Wage Exp $5K, Cr Wages Payable $5K.

*Logic*: Matching principle: expense when incurred, not when cash moves.

*Topic 21: Basis of Apportionment & Reapportionment*

*Case*: Service dept HR $200K serves Production A 60% and B 40%. Maintenance $150K allocated by machine hours: A 1000, B 2000.

*Q*: Total OH to Dept B?

*A*: HR to B = 200K×40% = $80K. Maint to B = 150K×2000/3000 = $100K. *Total B = $180K*.

*Logic*: Step method: allocate service costs using causal basis.

*Topic 22: Capital Maintenance - Financial vs Physical*

*Case*: Co starts with $500K net assets. Inflation 10%. Year-end net assets $540K at historical cost, $600K at current cost.

*Q*: Is capital maintained under financial concept?

*A*: *Yes*. $540K > $500K beginning. Under *physical*, no - need $550K to maintain operating capability.

*Logic*: Financial = nominal dollars. Physical = operating capacity.

*Topic 23: Liquidity, Solvency, Leverage Ratios*

*Case*: CA $300K, CL $200K, Total Debt $400K, Equity $600K, EBITDA $150K, Interest $30K.

*Q*: Current ratio, Debt/Equity, Interest Coverage?

*A*: *Current* = 300/200 = *1.5*. *D/E* = 400/600 = *0.67*. *Coverage* = 150/30 = *5x*.

*Logic*: Liquidity = ST ability. Solvency = LT. Leverage = debt use.

*Topic 24: Capital Structure Decision*

*Case*: Co EBIT $500K, can raise $1M via 10% debt or equity. Tax 25%, shares 100K now.

*Q*: Which gives higher EPS? Indifference point?

*A*: *Debt EPS* = (500K-100K)×0.75/100K = $3.00. *Equity* = 500K×0.75/200K = $1.88. *Debt better*. Indifference EBIT = $200K.

*Logic*: EBIT-EPS analysis. Debt adds leverage + tax shield.

*Topic 25: Cash Equivalent vs Current Asset*

*Case*: Co holds: T-bill 60 days $50K, A/R $100K, Equity shares $80K, Cash $20K.

*Q*: Total cash + cash equivalents?

*A*: *$70K* = Cash $20K + T-bill $50K. Equity shares not cash equivalent, A/R is not.

*Logic*: ASC 230: ≤90 days, readily convertible, insignificant risk.

*Topic 26: Value for Money - 3Es*

*Case*: Govt dept cut program cost 20% but service users dropped 30%.

*Q*: Assess Economy, Efficiency, Effectiveness.

*A*: *Economy*: Yes, lower cost. *Efficiency*: Output/input worse. *Effectiveness*: No, outcomes failed. Not VFM.

*Logic*: VFM needs all 3Es, not just cost cutting.

*Topic 27: Risk Assessment - COSO*

*Case*: Audit finds inventory theft risk. Mgmt implements cycle counts + camera, reduces likelihood from High to Low.

*Q*: What risk response is this?

*A*: *Risk reduction* via preventive controls. Residual risk now low.

*Logic*: 4 responses: Accept, Avoid, Reduce, Share. Part of COSO ERM.

*Topic 28: Corporate Governance - Board Role*

*Case*: Board has 8 members: 5 independent, separate Chair/CEO, audit committee 100% independent.

*Q*: Which governance best practices are met?

*A*: *Board independence, separation of Chair/CEO, independent audit committee* - all align with SOX/NYSE rules.

*Logic*: CMA Part 2 Ethics/Governance domain.

*Topic 29: Accounting Information System - Controls*

*Case*: System auto-matches PO-Receipt-Invoice before payment. Clerk cannot override.

*Q*: What type of AIS control?

*A*: *Application control* - specifically a *3-way match*, input + processing control.

*Logic*: Prevents payments without goods/services.

*Topic 30: Types of Cost - Relevant vs Sunk*

*Case*: Machine book value $80K, can sell for $50K or modify for $30K to use. New machine $100K.

*Q*: Which costs are relevant to replace decision?

*A*: *Relevant*: $30K modify, $100K new, $50K disposal value. *Sunk*: $80K book value.

*Logic*: Only future differential costs matter.

*Topic 31: Cost Assignment vs Cost Allocation*

*Case*: Direct materials $20K traced to Job 101. Factory rent $200K split to depts by sqft.

*Q*: Identify assignment vs allocation.

*A*: *Assignment*: DM $20K directly traced. *Allocation*: Rent $200K using cost driver sqft.

*Logic*: Assignment = direct trace. Allocation = indirect via driver.

*Topic 32: Efficiency vs Effectiveness - Operations*

*Case*: Plant made 10K units at std cost, but only 7K met quality. Budget was 9K good units.

*Q*: Efficient? Effective?

*A*: *Efficient*: Yes, output vs input ok. *Effective*: No, didn’t meet quality goal of 9K.

*Logic*: Efficiency = doing things right. Effectiveness = doing right things.

*Topic 33: Labor Efficiency Variance - Revised*

*Case*: Std 3 hrs/unit, 500 units. Actual 1,600 hrs, rate $18, std rate $20.

*Q*: LEV and rate variance?

*A*: *LEV* = (1600-1500)×20 = *$2,000 U*. *LRV* = (18-20)×1600 = *$3,200 F*.

*Logic*: Split price vs quantity variances.

*Topic 34: Variable OH Efficiency Variance*

*Case*: VOH rate $4/hr, same hours as labor above.

*Q*: VOHEV?

*A*: *VOHEV* = (1600-1500)×4 = *$400 U*.

*Logic*: VOH varies with hours, so uses same efficiency difference.

*Topic 35: Strategic Management - SWOT*

*Case*: Co has strong brand = S, but high debt = W, new market opening = O, new regulation = T.

*Q*: What strategy for S+O combo?

*A*: *Growth/Aggressive strategy* - use brand to enter new market. S+T = use brand to lobby.

*Logic*: SWOT matrix: SO, WO, ST, WT strategies.

 *Batch 3 of 5: 20 more CMA case-based questions* 💪

*US CMA Case-Based Practice Set - Batch 3*

*Topic 36: Internal Control - COSO 5 Components*

*Case*: Audit finds company has strong tone at the top, risk assessment matrix, authorization limits, monthly variance review, and whistleblower hotline monitored by internal audit.

*Q*: Which COSO component is the hotline?

*A*: *Monitoring Activities* - ongoing/ separate evaluations to assess if controls work.

*Logic*: COSO 2013: Control Env, Risk Assess, Control Activities, Info & Comm, Monitoring.

*Topic 37: COSO 17 Principles - Principle 11*

*Case*: IT dept implements access controls, change management, and backup procedures for ERP.

*Q*: Which COSO principle does this satisfy?

*A*: *Principle 11: Selects and develops general controls over technology*.

*Logic*: Part of Control Activities component. IT general controls.

*Topic 38: Limitations of Internal Control*

*Case*: Two warehouse staff collude to steal inventory and bypass counts. Controls existed but failed.

*Q*: What IC limitation is this?

*A*: *Collusion* - controls can be circumvented by 2+ people conspiring.

*Logic*: Others: human error, mgmt override, cost/benefit. IC = reasonable assurance only.

*Topic 39: Data Integration - ERP*

*Case*: Sales order auto-creates AR entry, reduces inventory, and posts COGS without manual entry.

*Q*: What benefit of AIS/ERP is shown?

*A*: *Data integration* - single entry updates multiple modules, reduces errors & redundancy.

*Logic*: CMA Part 1 Tech: ERP integrates data across functions.

*Topic 40: Technology Controls - Input/Processing/Output*

*Case*: System rejects invoice date > today, calculates tax automatically, and prints exception report for variances >5%.

*Q*: Identify control type for each.

*A*: *Input*: edit check on date. *Processing*: automated calc. *Output*: exception report review.

*Logic*: Application controls cover all 3 stages.

*Topic 41: ROI Manipulation*

*Case*: Division A ROI = 20%. Mgr can invest in project: NI $50K, Assets $400K. Corp hurdle 12%.

*Q*: Will mgr accept? Why is ROI flawed here?

*A*: *No*. Project ROI = 12.5% < 20% division ROI, so mgr rejects though it’s > hurdle. *Flaw*: Goal congruence problem.

*Logic*: ROI creates disincentive for good projects if they lower divisional ROI.

*Topic 42: Residual Income - Pitfall*

*Case*: Division RI = $200K using 10% charge. Assets include $1M idle land. Without land, RI = $300K.

*Q*: What RI problem is shown?

*A*: *Overinvestment/assets not used* - managers not penalized for idle assets if charge rate too low.

*Logic*: RI better than ROI but still needs correct capital charge & asset base.

*Topic 43: Responsibility Accounting - Controllable Costs*

*Case*: Plant mgr charged with head office legal fees allocated by sales. Mgr cannot influence legal.

*Q*: Should legal be in mgr’s performance report?

*A*: *No*. Only controllable costs should be used to evaluate mgr.

*Logic*: Responsibility accounting: evaluate on what mgr controls.

*Topic 44: Transfer Pricing - Goal Congruence*

*Case*: Division S makes parts at variable $20, market $35. Division B buys. If transfer = $20, S loses motivation. If $35, B buys outside.

*Q*: Best transfer price range for goal congruence?

*A*: *$20 ≤ TP ≤ $35*. Negotiated price, or variable + opportunity cost. 

*Logic*: TP must motivate both + maximize corp profit.

*Topic 45: Types of Responsibility Centers*

*Case*: R&D dept has $2M budget, no revenue. Sales dept has revenue target but no cost control. Hotel unit controls profit.

*Q*: Identify each center type.

*A*: R&D = *Cost/Expense center*. Sales = *Revenue center*. Hotel = *Profit center* or *Investment* if assets too.

*Logic*: Based on what mgr controls: costs, rev, profit, or ROI/RI.

*Topic 46: Strategic Management - Porter’s 5 Forces*

*Case*: New startup in airline industry. High capital, strong brand loyalty to incumbents, limited suppliers, price-sensitive customers.

*Q*: Which 2 forces are most unfavorable?

*A*: *Threat of new entrants - low* due to capital/brand. *Bargaining power of buyers - high* due to price sensitivity.

*Logic*: Use 5 forces to assess industry attractiveness.

*Topic 47: Value Chain Analysis*

*Case*: Co finds inbound logistics cost 30% above competitor due to 10 suppliers vs 2.

*Q*: Which primary activity needs improvement?

*A*: *Inbound logistics* - primary activity. Solution: supplier rationalization.

*Logic*: Porter value chain: 5 primary + 4 support activities.

*Topic 48: Corporate Governance - SOX 404*

*Case*: CEO/CFO must certify financials and mgmt must assess IC over financial reporting. Auditor attests.

*Q*: What SOX section is this?

*A*: *Section 404* - Management assessment of ICFR + auditor attestation.

*Logic*: SOX 302 = officer certification. 404 = ICFR assessment.

*Topic 49: Risk Assessment - Inherent vs Residual*

*Case*: Cyber risk likelihood High, impact High before controls. After firewall + training, likelihood Low, impact Medium.

*Q*: Identify inherent vs residual risk.

*A*: *Inherent*: High/High. *Residual*: Low/Medium.

*Logic*: Inherent = before controls. Residual = after controls.

*Topic 50: Accounting Information System - Segregation of Duties*

*Case*: Same clerk approves PO, receives goods, and approves payment.

*Q*: Which SOD conflict exists? Fix?

*A*: *Conflict*: Authorization + custody + recordkeeping. *Fix*: Split duties - one approves PO, another receives, third records.

*Logic*: SOD prevents fraud/error. Key IC principle.

*Topic 51: Absorption Costing - Income Effect*

*Case*: Production > Sales by 2,000 units. FOH rate $6/unit. Variable NI = $100K.

*Q*: Absorption NI?

*A*: *$112K* = 100K + (2,000×6) FOH deferred in inventory.

*Logic*: When production > sales, absorption > variable by FOH in ending inv.

*Topic 52: Capital Structure - WACC*

*Case*: 60% debt at 6%, 40% equity at 14%, tax 25%.

*Q*: WACC?

*A*: WACC = 0.6×6%×0.75 + 0.4×14% = 2.7% + 5.6% = *8.3%*.

*Logic*: Use after-tax cost of debt.

*Topic 53: Proprietary Theory - Balance Sheet Equation*

*Case*: Assets $1M, Liab $400K.

*Q*: Equity under proprietary theory emphasis?

*A*: *Equity = $600K*, focus on owners’ residual claim: A - L = Proprietorship.

*Logic*: Entity theory: A = L + E, entity focus. Proprietary: net worth focus.

*Topic 54: Cash Equivalent Criteria - US GAAP*

*Case*: Co buys 120-day CD, 2-year bond, money market fund with 1-day liquidity.

*Q*: Which are cash equivalents?

*A*: *Only money market fund*. CD >90 days. Bond >90 days.

*Logic*: ASC 230: original maturity ≤3 months + readily convertible.

*Topic 55: Strategic Management - BCG Matrix*

*Case*: Product A: High market share, low growth. Product B: Low share, high growth.

*Q*: Classify each + strategy.

*A*: A = *Cash Cow* - harvest. B = *Question Mark* - invest or divest.

*Logic*: BCG: Star, Cash Cow, Question Mark, Dog.

*Batch 4 of 5: 20 more CMA case-based questions* 🚀

*US CMA Case-Based Practice Set - Batch 4*

*Topic 56: Finance Lease ASC 842 - Short Term Exemption*

*Case*: Co leases copier for 11 months, $500/month, no purchase option. PV of payments = $5,300, FV = $6,000.

*Q*: Finance or operating? How recorded?

*A*: *Operating - short-term lease exemption*. No asset/liability on balance sheet. Expense $500/month straight-line.

*Logic*: ASC 842: ≤12 months + no purchase option = elect short-term exemption.

*Topic 57: Revenue - Variable Consideration*

*Case*: Contract $1M + bonus $100K if completed by Dec 31. Co estimates 70% chance of earning bonus. Most likely amount.

*Q*: Transaction price at inception?

*A*: *$1,070K* using expected value: 1M + (100K×0.7). Or $1.1M if “most likely” used and 70% >50%.

*Logic*: ASC 606 Step 3: Include variable consideration if not constrained.

*Topic 58: Revenue - Sales with Right of Return*

*Case*: Sold 1,000 units @ $50. Historically 5% returned. Cost $30/unit.

*Q*: Revenue, COGS, and refund liability at sale?

*A*: *Revenue* = 950×50 = $47,500. *COGS* = 950×30 = $28,500. *Refund liability* = 50×50 = $2,500. *Return asset* = 50×30 = $1,500.

*Logic*: Recognize net of expected returns + record liability + asset for returns.

*Topic 59: Cash Flow - Direct Method CFO*

*Case*: Sales $800K, A/R increased $40K, COGS $500K, Inventory decreased $20K, A/P increased $10K, Op Exp $150K, Wages Pay decreased $5K.

*Q*: CFO using direct method?

*A*: *Cash from customers* = 800K-40K = $760K. *Cash to suppliers* = 500K-20K-10K = $470K. *Cash for op exp* = 150K+5K = $155K. *CFO* = 760-470-155 = *$135K*.

*Logic*: Direct: adjust each I/S line for WC changes.

*Topic 60: Integrated Reporting - Manufactured Capital*

*Case*: Co builds new plant $20M, increasing production capacity 25%, but old plant impaired $5M.

*Q*: Net impact on manufactured capital in <IR>?

*A*: *+$15M net increase* in manufactured capital stock. Also disclose impact on financial capital -$20M+$5M.

*Logic*: <IR> tracks increases/decreases to all 6 capitals.

*Topic 61: Wasting Assets - Timber*

*Case*: Timberland $2M, est. 500K board feet. Cut 80K feet yr1. Replanting costs $100K expensed.

*Q*: Depletion expense yr1?

*A*: *$320K* = 80K/500K × $2M. Replanting = expense, not capitalized.

*Logic*: Timber depletion like other natural resources. Regrowth not added to cost.

*Topic 62: Service Dept Apportionment - Reciprocal Method*

*Case*: HR serves Maint 20%, Prod 80%. Maint serves HR 10%, Prod 90%. HR cost $100K, Maint $200K.

*Q*: Total cost allocated to Prod using reciprocal?

*A*: Set equations: H = 100K + 0.1M, M = 200K + 0.2H. Solve: H=$122K, M=$224K. *To Prod* = 0.8H+0.9M = 97.6K+201.6K = *$299.2K*.

*Logic*: Reciprocal recognizes mutual services. Most accurate.

*Topic 63: EVA vs RI*

*Case*: NOPAT $600K, WACC 10%, Capital $5M, Accounting NI $500K.

*Q*: EVA and RI? Difference?

*A*: *EVA* = 600K - (5M×10%) = *$100K*. *RI* = 500K - (5M×10%) = *$0*. Diff = NOPAT vs NI.

*Logic*: EVA uses NOPAT + economic adjustments. RI uses accounting NI.

*Topic 64: Transfer Pricing - Dual Pricing*

*Case*: Sell division transfers at $30 = full cost. Buy division charged $30 but sell division credited at $35 market.

*Q*: What TP method? Impact?

*A*: *Dual pricing*. Avoids suboptimal decisions. Corp absorbs $5 diff as period cost.

*Logic*: Used when goal congruence needed but divisions evaluated separately.

*Topic 65: ABC Costing*

*Case*: Two products: A 1K units, 10 setups. B 9K units, 10 setups. Setup cost pool $100K.

*Q*: Setup cost per unit using ABC vs traditional volume?

*A*: *ABC*: $100K/20 setups = $5K/setup. A = $50K/1K = *$50/unit*. B = $50K/9K = *$5.56/unit*. *Traditional*: $100K/10K = *$10/unit both*.

*Logic*: ABC avoids over/undercosting by using activity driver, not volume.

*Topic 66: Absorption Costing - Production = Sales*

*Case*: Produced & sold 5K. FOH $30K, V cost/unit $12, Sell $25.

*Q*: NI under both methods?

*A*: *Same NI* = (25-12)×5K - 30K = *$35K*. No FOH deferred.

*Logic*: When production = sales, absorption = variable NI.

*Topic 67: Labor Rate Variance - Cause*

*Case*: LRV = $3,000 U. Investigation: had to use higher-skilled workers due to rush order.

*Q*: Is variance controllable? Who’s responsible?

*A*: *Controllable by Production Mgr* who accepted rush order. Or Sales if they promised rush delivery.

*Logic*: CMA emphasizes identifying responsibility, not just calc.

*Topic 68: Corporate Governance - Agency Problem*

*Case*: CEO buys corporate jet for “client meetings” but uses 80% personal. Shareholders bear cost.

*Q*: What governance issue? Fix?

*A*: *Agency problem* - mgr vs owner interests. *Fix*: Independent board, comp tied to performance, expense policy.

*Logic*: CG mechanisms align agent with principal.

*Topic 69: Risk Assessment - Risk Map*

*Case*: Risk A: High likelihood, Low impact. Risk B: Low likelihood, High impact.

*Q*: Which to prioritize for mitigation?

*A*: *Risk B first* if impact catastrophic. Use risk map: Impact×Likelihood.

*Logic*: COSO ERM: prioritize by severity, not just frequency.

*Topic 70: AIS - Database Controls*

*Case*: System requires customer ID to exist in master file before invoice created.

*Q*: What control?

*A*: *Validity check / existence check* - input control in relational database.

*Logic*: Ensures referential integrity. Prevents invoices to fake customers.

*Topic 71: Efficiency Variance - Overhead*

*Case*: Fixed OH budgeted $100K for 10K hrs. Actual $102K, actual hrs 11K, std hrs for output 10.5K.

*Q*: FOH volume variance?

*A*: *Volume var* = (10.5K-10K)×$10 = *$5,000 F*. Spending = 102K-100K = $2K U.

*Logic*: FOH var split to budget/spending vs volume. Volume due to activity level.

*Topic 72: Responsibility Center - Investment Center*

*Case*: Division mgr controls sales, costs, and decides to buy new $2M machine.

*Q*: What center type? Best measure?

*A*: *Investment center*. Evaluate with *ROI, RI, or EVA* since mgr controls assets.

*Logic*: Highest level of responsibility.

*Topic 73: Capital Maintenance - Physical*

*Case*: Start: 100 machines. End: 95 machines + cash $200K. 5 machines cost $50K each to replace.

*Q*: Is physical capital maintained?

*A*: *No*. Need $250K to replace 5 machines. Only have $200K. Short $50K.

*Logic*: Physical concept: maintain operating capability, not dollars.

*Topic 74: Contingency - Gain*

*Case*: Co sues vendor, legal says win is probable for $1M. No settlement yet.

*Q*: Record gain?

*A*: *No*. Disclose only. *Gain contingencies never accrued* until realized.

*Logic*: Conservatism ASC 450: losses accrued, gains not.

*Topic 75: Strategic Management - Differentiation vs Cost Leadership*

*Case*: Co spends heavy on R&D, charges premium, targets quality buyers. Competitor uses basic tech, low price, high volume.

*Q*: Identify each strategy.

*A*: Co = *Differentiation*. Competitor = *Cost Leadership*.

*Logic*: Porter generic strategies.

 *Final Batch 5 of 5: Last 25 CMA case-based questions* to hit 100/100 🎯

*US CMA Case-Based Practice Set - Batch 5*

*Topic 76: Operating Leverage*

*Case*: Co A: CM 60%, Fixed costs $300K. Co B: CM 30%, Fixed costs $100K. Both have sales $1M.

*Q*: Which has higher DOL? If sales ↑10%, NI change for each?

*A*: *DOL A* = 600K/(600K-300K) = *2.0*. *DOL B* = 300K/(300K-100K) = *1.5*. Sales ↑10%: A NI ↑20%, B NI ↑15%.

*Logic*: DOL = CM/Operating Income. High fixed cost = high leverage = higher risk/return.

*Topic 77: EBIT-EPS Indifference Point*

*Case*: Current: 100K shares, no debt. Plan: Issue $1M debt at 8% or 50K new shares. Tax 25%. 

*Q*: At what EBIT are EPS same under debt vs equity?

*A*: (EBIT-80K)×0.75/100K = EBIT×0.75/150K. Solve: *EBIT = $240K*.

*Logic*: Indifference: EPS_debt = EPS_equity.

*Topic 78: Property Dividend - Journal Entries*

*Case*: Declared land as dividend. Book $120K, FMV $200K on declaration, $210K on distribution.

*Q*: Entries on declaration & distribution dates?

*A*: *Declaration*: Dr RE 200K, Cr Prop Div Pay 200K, Dr Land 80K, Cr Gain 80K. *Distribution*: Dr Prop Div Pay 200K, Cr Land 200K.

*Logic*: ASC 505: Revalue to FMV at declaration, gain/loss recognized then.

*Topic 79: Stock Split vs Stock Dividend*

*Case*: 100K shares, $10 par, $50 market. Board does 2-for-1 split vs 100% stock dividend.

*Q*: Impact on RE, par, shares?

*A*: *Split*: 200K shares $5 par, RE unchanged. *100% Stock Div*: 200K shares $10 par, Dr RE $1M, Cr Common Stock $1M.

*Logic*: Split = no JE except memo. Large stock div >25% = treat like split but reduce RE at par.

*Topic 80: Cash Equivalents - Commercial Paper*

*Case*: On Dec 31, Co holds: 60-day CP $40K, 120-day CD $30K, Money Market $25K.

*Q*: Total cash equivalents?

*A*: *$65K* = CP $40K + MM $25K. CD >90 days not equivalent.

*Logic*: Original maturity ≤90 days qualifies.

*Topic 81: Purchase Commitment - Loss Recognition*

*Case*: Nov 1: Signed non-cancelable PO for 10K units @ $15. Dec 31: Market = $12. No units received yet.

*Q*: US GAAP treatment at 12/31?

*A*: *Accrue loss $30K*: Dr Loss on Purchase Commitment 30K, Cr Estimated Liability 30K.

*Logic*: ASC 330: Recognize loss if market < contract and commitment firm.

*Topic 82: Integrated Reporting - Trade-offs*

*Case*: Co invests $5M in training: Financial capital ↓$5M, Human capital ↑, future Financial capital ↑ est $8M.

*Q*: How <IR> shows this?

*A*: Reports decrease in Financial capital but increase in Human + future Financial. *Shows value creation, not just expense*.

*Logic*: <IR> explains capitals transformation over time.

*Topic 83: Proprietary vs Entity - Consolidated NI*

*Case*: P owns 80% S. S NI = $100K. No intercompany.

*Q*: Consolidated NI under each theory?

*A*: *Entity*: $100K, then show NCI $20K. *Proprietary*: $80K only, NCI ignored.

*Logic*: Entity = full consolidation. Proprietary = proportionate.

*Topic 84: Depreciable vs Wasting Asset*

*Case*: Asset A: Factory building $1M/20yr. Asset B: Gold mine $1M/100K oz.

*Q*: Depreciation vs depletion method?

*A*: A = *Depreciable*: straight-line $50K/yr. B = *Wasting*: depletion by units produced.

*Logic*: Depreciable = PP&E. Wasting = natural resources.

*Topic 85: Job Order Costing - Over/Underapplied OH*

*Case*: Actual OH $220K, Applied OH = $200K based on 10K DLH × $20/hr.

*Q*: Amount & disposal if immaterial?

*A*: *$20K underapplied*. If immaterial: Dr COGS $20K, Cr Mfg OH $20K.

*Logic*: Close variance to COGS if small, else prorate to WIP/FG/COGS.

*Topic 86: Process Costing - EUP FIFO*

*Case*: BWIP: 1K units 40% done. Started 9K. EWIP: 2K units 30% done. Costs: BWIP $4K, Added $76K.

*Q*: EUP for costs added this period?

*A*: *8,200 EUP* = (1K×60%) + 7K started&completed + (2K×30%).

*Logic*: FIFO EUP = work done this period only.

*Topic 87: Strategic Management - GE McKinsey Matrix*

*Case*: BU has Medium industry attractiveness, High business strength.

*Q*: GE matrix quadrant & strategy?

*A*: *Upper middle = Invest/Grow selectively*. Build on strengths in attractive segments.

*Logic*: GE 9-box: Industry attractiveness vs biz strength.

*Topic 88: ROI vs RI - Behavioral*

*Case*: Division ROI = 25%, Corp hurdle = 15%. New project ROI = 18%, $500K investment.

*Q*: Will mgr take under ROI? Under RI? What’s best for corp?

*A*: *ROI*: Reject, lowers 25%. *RI*: Accept if 18%>15%. *Corp*: Accept, adds value.

*Logic*: RI aligns with corp goal; ROI can cause dysfunctional behavior.

*Topic 89: Absorption Costing - Production < Sales*

*Case*: Beg Inv 3K units with $6/unit FOH. Produced 7K, sold 9K. Variable NI = $80K.

*Q*: Absorption NI?

*A*: *$62K* = 80K - (3K×6) FOH released from beg inventory.

*Logic*: When sales > production, absorption < variable.

*Topic 90: Cash Flow - Bond Issued at Discount*

*Case*: Issued $1M bond for $950K cash. Interest paid $60K.

*Q*: CFF and CFO impact?

*A*: *CFF*: +$950K inflow. *CFO*: -$60K outflow for interest.

*Logic*: Principal in financing, interest in operating under US GAAP.

*Topic 91: Data Analytics - Predictive*

*Case*: Using 3 yrs sales + weather + promo data to forecast Q4 sales with regression model.

*Q*: What type of analytics?

*A*: *Predictive analytics* - forecasts future outcomes.

*Logic*: Descriptive = what happened. Diagnostic = why. Predictive = what will. Prescriptive = what should.

*Topic 92: Internal Control - Detective vs Preventive*

*Case*: Bank reconciliation vs pre-numbered POs.

*Q*: Classify each.

*A*: *Bank rec = detective*, finds errors after. *Pre-numbered PO = preventive*, stops duplicates/missing.

*Logic*: Preventive stops, detective finds.

*Topic 93: Capital Structure - Financial Leverage*

*Case*: EBIT $200K. Plan A: No debt. Plan B: $500K debt @ 10%. Tax 25%, 100K shares.

*Q*: DFL at EBIT $200K for Plan B?

*A*: *DFL* = EBIT/(EBIT-I) = 200K/(200K-50K) = *1.33*.

*Logic*: Degree of Financial Leverage shows EPS sensitivity to EBIT.

*Topic 94: Revenue - Principal vs Agent*

*Case*: Website sells tickets, remits 90% to venue, keeps 10%. Venue sets price, website not responsible if event cancels.

*Q*: Recognize gross or net?

*A*: *Net = $10% commission*. Website is *agent*, not principal.

*Logic*: ASC 606: Principal controls good/service before transfer. Agent doesn’t.

*Topic 95: Liquidity vs Solvency*

*Case*: Co has Current Ratio 0.8 but D/E 0.2 and huge cash reserves in long-term investments.

*Q*: Liquidity problem or solvency problem?

*A*: *Liquidity problem* - can’t meet ST obligations. *Solvent* - LT position strong.

*Logic*: Liquidity = ST, Solvency = LT.

*Topic 96: Cost Assignment - Direct vs Indirect*

*Case*: CEO salary $400K. Factory supervisor $90K for Product Line X only. 

*Q*: Classify each for Product Line X.

*A*: CEO = *Indirect*, allocated. Supervisor = *Direct*, traced.

*Logic*: Direct if traced economically. Indirect if not.

*Topic 97: Efficiency - Labor vs Machine*

*Case*: Std: 2 labor hrs + 1 machine hr per unit. Actual for 1K units: 2,200 LH, 900 MH.

*Q*: Which was efficient?

*A*: *Machine efficient*: 900 vs 1,000 std = 100H F. *Labor inefficient*: 2,200 vs 2,000 = 200H U.

*Logic*: Compare AH vs SH × actual output.

*Topic 98: Value for Money Audit*

*Case*: Govt built 10 schools for $10M, same quality as benchmark $12M, enrollment targets met.

*Q*: Was it VFM?

*A*: *Yes*: Economy - lower cost, Efficiency - same output, Effectiveness - met targets.

*Logic*: Public sector 3Es audit.

*Topic 99: Integrated Reporting - Social & Relationship Capital*

*Case*: Co spent $1M on community programs, customer satisfaction ↑15%, NPS now 60.

*Q*: Which capital increased?

*A*: *Social & Relationship Capital* - stakeholders, brand, community license to operate.

*Logic*: <IR> capital beyond financial.

*Topic 100: Ethics - IMA Statement*

*Case*: CMA asked by boss to defer expense to next quarter to hit bonus target. Refuses, reports to audit committee.

*Q*: Which IMA ethical standards applied?

*A*: *Competence, Confidentiality, Integrity, Credibility*. Specifically *Integrity*: refuse to be party to fraud, *Credibility*: communicate info fairly.

*Logic*: IMA requires resolution: discuss, then escalate if not resolved.

---

*100/100 Complete, 

You now have case-based coverage of every major CMA topic you listed: investments, leases, revenue, cash flow, IC, CG, risk, AIS, ratios, EPS, dividends, contingencies, costing, variances, ROI/RI, responsibility centers, plus strategy, tech, and ethics.

*How to use this*: 

1. Do Time bound mock practice

2. For each wrong answer, write why in 1 line - that’s your “trigger point”

3. Prof Mahaley’s method: After each, ask “What CMA topic subtopic+ what formula or key terms+ theory or practical questions+short or lengthy question+what trap?”

www.gmsisuccess.in